|
For the past four years, I have been living with a
mystery—a real-life mystery about some things that weren't supposed to
happen but did anyway. Today I will share with you what has been going
on, at least to the extent my limited knowledge—and my fear
of a libel suit—will allow. Like any good mystery, this one offers more
questions than answers.
I am prompted to write by a posting to the forum
riskchat.com directed to me by a professor based in the Philippines:
|
Attn: Glyn, Re: your book
Academic Press, the publisher of your book, has been
acquired, I understand by Elsevier. I have contacted
Elsevier in this neck of the woods (Philippines) to acquire
a copy for myself and a copy for the university where I
teach. The Elsevier office here, however, could not find
your book in their listings (even with the ISBN given).
Kindly advise. |
The professor is referring to my book
Value-at-Risk: Theory and Practice. I devoted six years of my life
to writing that book. It published in 2003, and at the time, Christopher
Culp wrote that the book was "bound to become the standard advanced text
and reference work on value-at-risk." That didn't happen. Instead,
e-mails started arriving from people frustrated they couldn't get
copies. Within three years, the book was taken out of print.
Elsevier is one of the world's largest publishers,
with distribution channels in pretty much every geographic region. There
should have been no problem, but there was. There were many problems,
actually. I detailed these in a letter to Duncan Enright, publishing
director at Elsevier.
|
June 1, 2005
Dear
Duncan:
I
hope you are well and that you are finding success in your
new role as publishing director ... As I related earlier, it
seems everything that could go wrong with the marketing of a
book has gone wrong with the marketing of my book. I gave
you a list of some of the problems that I am aware of. This
may be worth repeating:
1.
The book was not cataloged with the US Library of Congress.
Three months after it published, I insisted that this be
done.
2. An
incorrect ISBN was widely distributed for the book.
3.
Incorrect shelving instructions were distributed for the
book indicating that the book should be shelved under
marketing or radical economics instead of finance.
4.
The book was not listed in the US catalog Books in Print.
Repeated requests for this to be fixed were to no avail. I
eventually fixed it myself.
5.
Incorrect and incomplete information about the book was
posted to on-line bookstores. For months, I asked that this
be fixed. It never happened. Eventually, I contacted the
on-line bookstores and fixed the problems myself.
6.
Inventory management failed to reprint the book last spring,
so the US supply ran out. Extra books were not secured from
the European warehouse, so the book went out of print in the
US. Rather than rush a second printing, Elsevier spent four
months on the reprint. The book was out of print in the US
during the critical September month.
... I
have spent considerable time identifying and working to
resolve issues. While doing so, I have been troubled by a
lack of candor and frequently poor cooperation from Elsevier
staff. It seems that, as quickly as I resolved problems, new
problems cropped up ... I am no longer attempting to
identify or resolve problems. I am now focusing my efforts
on obtaining a reversion of rights, which is the purpose of
this letter ...
Thank
you,
Glyn Holton |
Essentially, the letter said that Elsevier staff,
rather than marketing the book, had presented would-be buyers with
misinformation, denied them information or otherwise put up roadblocks
in about every distribution channel I could think of. If a would-be
purchaser had the wrong ISBN number, she would be frustrated searching
for a copy online. Any acquisitions librarian would have reservations
about buying a book whose publisher didn't bother to catalog it with the
Library of Congress or list it in Books in Print. Someone
browsing in a bookstore for a book on value-at-risk would reasonably
look in the finance section, and not find my book shelved under radical
economics.
There were really two reasons why I approached
Elsevier to have rights in the book returned to me. One was the
marketing issues detailed in my letter. The other, which I did not
mention to Duncan, involved the author of a competing book on
value-at-risk. Let's call this author Junior.
Junior had had previous business dealings with one
of the editors at Elsevier. That relationship was not disclosed to me
until after I had signed a publishing contract. Normally, such a
relationship wouldn't be a big deal. Any editor should know a lot of
potential authors. However, Junior wasn't just any competing author. I
knew things about his attitudes and ethics that would have kept me from
signing that publishing contract. When the editor sheepishly did
acknowledge the relationship, it was too late. I had signed the contract, and
there was no backing out. All I could do was assume the editor would
act professionally and hope for the best. As my letter to Duncan
indicates, my hopes were dashed.
Were the marketing problems and the relationship
with Junior somehow related? It is hard to say. I certainly know more
about both than I will relate here—a lot more. However, if pressed for a
definitive answer, I would have to say I am not in a position to know. I
have many questions but few answers.
I apologize to everyone who was inconvenienced by
what happened. In particular, I received numerous e-mails from
professors who never received review copies of the book, which they had
requested from Elsevier. I interceded for all of them with the publisher, but I
suspect none ever received copies. Those professors could probably have obtained
a review copy of any other finance book from the publisher—any but mine.
Despite considerable interest, I believe this prevented my book from
being adopted for a single finance course. If it were, the adopting
professor would have been disappointed when the publisher temporarily
took the book out of print over September 2004, as there would have been
no copies available for students anyway.
As it turned out, Duncan Enright responded
favorably to my letter, commenting
|
June 6, 2005
Dear Glyn
Thanks very much for your
letter which arrived last thing on Friday ... The problems
you mention are rather unusual. I won't trouble you with
explanations or excuses as it is clear you want to talk
about the future.
It is not our normal policy
to grant a reversion of rights, but there is little point in
my view in continuing as we are. I am therefore prepared to
give you back your rights subject to some conditions, which
I hope you will understand ...
Thanks again for the
letter.
Duncan Enright |
Duncan's conditions were just a few loose ends,
which we soon cleared up. Today, I again own all rights in my book. I
need to find a publisher to re-release the book. My main problem is
time. I am so busy I don't know when I will get around to it.
Until then, there are still copies available for
sale. A good place to look is amazon.com, which lists new or used copies
available from third-party vendors. Some of those vendors will ship
internationally. The last time I checked, copies were selling for around
$115, which is $20 over the list price. I am flattered the books are
selling for so much, but I don't want readers getting gouged. If prices
rise too much, I have a number of personal copies which I will list on
Amazon to put downward pressure on prices.
Glyn A. Holton
Visit
the book's website.
Buy
new or used copies available from third-party vendors on amazon.com.
|
|